Firstly: All legal relationships exist in somewhat of a virtual dimension as they, independently, do not generate any products or other tangible goods. It is construct that facilitate individuals and entities in performing their daily tasks. Consider the example of a theater’s cloakroom. If you go to the theater and leave your coat in the cloakroom, you haven’t overtly conducted any legal proceedings for this action, but in reality, you have entered into an agreement for coat storage, which is regulated by applicable civil law. This is a simple example, but the principle holds regardless of the scale, sphere, or form of legal action (digital, written, or verbal). Secondly: Jurisprudence and software engineering share more commonalities than one might realize. Every legal act (be it public law, local regulation, or an agreement) is analogous to an algorithm whereby legal relations are established between subjects either by performing or abstaining from performing legal actions. From this perspective, legal language can be viewed as a high-level programming language complete with its own objects, subjects, classes, and actions or inactions, serving as counterparts to the binary 1s and 0s used in transistors. Consequently, law employs Boolean logic similar to software programs. To comprehend this parallel, consider the history of the invention of the first digital computer.